Sections

Repeating the past: Brooklyn Dem. leader pushing to temporarily install former pol in Squadron’s Senate seat

Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Welcome back, Connor.

Brooklyn’s Democratic Party boss is angling for a former Kings County state senator to return to the seat recently vacated by Daniel Squadron, claiming the pol would serve for a year and not seek re-election so that there can be a proper vote to fill the seat in next year’s primary.

Kings County Democratic Party chairman Frank Seddio said that by temporarily installing 30-year veteran lawmaker and former state Senate minority leader Martin Connor in the position the party would avoid filling Squadron’s seat with someone chosen by county committees and allow for a more democratic process to choose a permanent replacement down the line.

“Let him be a placeholder for the 13 months remaining and then have a real primary,” Seddio said.

Squadron, who ousted Connor from the 26th-District state Senate seat in 2008, resigned from Albany’s upper house in August. But the pol stepped down after the petition-filing deadline for candidates to get on the September ballot passed, preventing an all-important primary vote from determining a Democratic nominee that almost certainly would win the seat in November’s general election.

Instead, the nominee and Squadron’s likely successor — who will also represent parts of Manhattan — will be chosen by county committees in Brooklyn and Manhattan. And, as a result of party rules that weight the decision in favor of the distant island’s committee members, Manhattan party boss Keith Wright is ultimately empowered to choose the nominee, according to Connor, who currently works as an election attorney in Brooklyn Heights.

Seddio said he hopes to sell Wright on the plan in the coming days, arguing it would be fairer for voters to choose from a fresh slate of candidates next year that does not include an incumbent selected via county committees.

“Incumbency has an enormous amount of value, so not having that would allow a real election,” he said.

Connor — who told the Brooklyn Paper in August he had no intention to campaign for Squadron’s seat — said he would agree to assume the position at the request of Seddio and other Democrats, claiming it is the best move for the party.

“I’m not running, I’m not making calls, but if that’s helpful to the party and the constituents and would give the other candidates an open shot in the primaries, I’d be willing to do it,” he said.

The former pol promised he would not seek re-election next year if appointed, and his word is good enough for Brooklyn’s Democratic Party boss, even though there is nothing that would legally prevent Connor from launching a campaign.

“I’ve known Marty Connor for 30 years,” Seddio said. “He’s one of the most honest people I know in terms of how he handles his political role. I can’t imagine him giving his word and not keeping it.”

The only Brooklynite vying for Squadron’s old seat said she also supports a placeholder candidate, arguing that while she’s not married to Connor for the job, the idea of an open election in next year’s primary is worth the political maneuver.

“I haven’t spoken to Marty Connor himself, but a placeholder that promises not to run is the most democratic thing,” said Eileen Naples. “To give the choice of the democratic nominee to the voters, ultimately, is the goal.”

But some past supporters of Connor are skeptical that he will willingly hand over the position if appointed.

“I would cast a cold eye on such a promise, because too often promises are broken,” said Sean Sweeny, who voted for Connor in 2008 and belongs to a political club in Manhattan.

And another hopeful courting the county committees in his bid to replace Squadron decried any effort by party bosses to handpick a candidate, arguing that would destroy any democracy that remains in this unusual election.

“The idea that two county leaders would sit together and decide without the committee members who have been selected for this purpose would be the least democratic outcome,” said Manhattan resident Paul Newell.

Reach reporter Colin Mixson at cmixson@cnglocal.com or by calling (718) 260-4505.
Posted 12:00 am, September 11, 2017
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reasonable discourse

Chris Bastian from Brooklyn Heights says:
Hell No! I worked on Daniel Squadron's first campaign precisely to get rid of political hacks like Martin Connor. I attended yesterday's candidate forums, and ANY of the current bunch would be a marked improvement.

nb - it's ironic that the Party boss, who's made no effort to democratize the sloppy selection process is now concerned about it.
Sept. 11, 10:09 am
Chris Bastian from Brooklyn Heights says:
Eileen Naples is NOT the only Brooklyn in the race; former City Council member and BH resident David Yassky is running as well.
Sept. 11, 10:12 am
Andrew Porter from Brooklyn Heights says:
What! Hey, how about Fred Richmond, or Abe Gerges?
Sept. 11, 1:43 pm
Judi Francis from Cobble Hill says:
Connor proved to be one of the worst representatives for NYC, and for his district constituents, too. He voted against the commuter tax (favoring his upstate cronies and securing a good committee seat for himself). He sponsored the legislation to put private housing inside our park and has voted on the Brooklyn Bridge Park board every single time for MORE privatizing housing despite the now undisputed (yes, even the mayor and the BBP administrators admit) lack of financial need. He is a very poor choice and this shows, again, the corruption rampant in the state democratic machine. We deserve better. We deserve a commitment from party leaders for an open seat until electioneering can truly be done by all possible candidates and a vote. Another mess left to us by Squadron.
Sept. 11, 1:59 pm
Better Than Porter from Brooklyn Hoots says:
how about Carol Bellamy or Joe Pesce?
Sept. 11, 2:02 pm
Jonathan Edwards from Greenpoint says:
Notwithstanding whether the party leaders or the county committee should fill the vacancy, the voters voted Mr. Connor out of office and you shove him back down their throats? Seriously?
Sept. 11, 8 pm
Bob Edwards from Cobble Hill says:
Is it better that we have someone appointed to the seat by the party bosses who will then be the incumbent election cycle after election cycle? With absolutely no Democratic primary! Is that right and proper?
Sept. 11, 11:20 pm
Dr Spock from Albany, New York says:
99% of incumbents get re-elected.

Not Marty Connor.

Senator Connor was in that 1% of the special losers club. Think about that Vito.
Sept. 11, 11:36 pm
Nelson from Cobble Hill says:
Vito can't imagine "Marty giving his word and not keeping it".

That's rich !!
Sept. 12, 3:33 am
moog says:
When I synthesize the article and the comments I end up with, this is a brilliant idea but Marty Connor ain't the guy. Other than his penchant for underage boys, Fred Richmond might be perfect. He's too old to cause much harm or to run in 13 months. Chris, it's not a race, unless having party insiders lobby the county leaders counts as running. And Nelson, not only is Vito Lopez no longer the Kings County leader, he isn't even alive.
Sept. 12, 9:41 am
The Losers Club from Progressive Lane says:
For decades it looked like we would be stuck with Marty Connor and Jim Brennan forever. The un dynamic duo.

Now Marty is back. Anything for a buck.
Sept. 12, 9:58 am

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with the stories people are talking about in your neighborhood:

Optional: Help us tailor our newsletters to you!